Celebrity Activism

Celebrity Activism

Celebrity activism has been slowly growing, more celebrities want more attention and fame, and getting involved in activist movements is a way to bring themselves more media attention. However, it also brings a lot of awareness to the movement or charity. Although some celebrities do become involved in activism for more media attention, some celebrities do use their platform to educate. It has become easier for celebrities to become involved in these movements, as they were previously controlled by their agents or PR, but social media has enabled celebrities to take control of the causes and movements they want to support.

Celebrities bring:

  • Awareness
  • Political Lobbying
  • Fundraising

“Celebrity icons are very often the public faces of wider movements”

Rojeck (2002)

It has been researched that the public is more likely to become involved and support movements whose celebrity endorsers had a sincere commitment. (Samman et al, 2009)

Lady Gaga has been involved with many activist movements since she rose to fame in 2008. However, most notably she has been very involved in activism against the ‘Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell’ campaign. One of her big activist movements was wearing the famous meat dress to the MTV Video Music Awards, there were many different interpretations of the dress, including Rojek (2002) suggesting that it could have been considered a ‘feminist movement’, she could have worn the dress to represent how women are treated in the music industry: like a piece of meat. However, she later stated that it was in support of the ‘Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell’ policy. The policy meant that LGBTQ+ people who were serving in the US military were unable to disclose their sexuality or talk about their relationships (even if they were married etc).

Made by Emma Adkins

Lady Gaga, not only wore this dress in support of a repeal of this policy, she also posted a video of her trying to phone her senator to demand change (but she is unable to get through), she encourages her fans to ‘phone their senators to ask them to vote for the repeal of the policy’. (Framing, 2013) Her fans did this, some getting through and some not, but they not only posted online of themselves phoning their senators, but they also encouraged their friends and family to do the same. By doing this Lady Gaga, not only reached her fans, but she reached a wider audience in trying to repeal this policy. Later on, the policy was finally repealed.

“However, the use of social media platforms such as Twitter, Facebook, YouTube and Tumblr by celebrities to communicate with their fans is now becoming an increasingly widespread occurrence”

Duit, L; Zwaan, K (2014)

However, there are always risks when associating celebrities with a charity or a movement. This is clearly seen by Naomi Campbell’s association with PETA. She appeared on an advert stating, “we’d rather go naked than wear fur”. After this, she wore fur at the Milan Fashion show in 1997, she claimed: “it’s only fashion, I don’t know what the fuss is about”. PETA lost all credibility for their campaign and to this day the battle between PETA and Naomi Campbell still rages.

Bibliography:

Duit, L; Zwaan, K (2014) The Ashgate Research companion to Fan Cultures, Farnham: Ashgate

Framing, RE (2013) Examining celebrity activism and social media: Lady Gaga Fandom and Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell, Accessed online 25th March 2019 http://reframe.sussex.ac.uk/activistmedia/2013/05/examining-celebrity-activism-and-social-media-lady-gaga-fandom-and-dont-ask-dont-tell/

Rojek, C (2002) Fame Attack: The inflation of Celebrity and its consequences, London: Routledge

Samman, E, Auliffe, EM, MacLachlan, M (2009) The role of celebrity in endorsing poverty reduction through international aid. International Journal of Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Marketing

Gender Media Issues- Film & TV industry

Gender Media Issues- Film & Tv Industry

Issues of gender representation have been prevalent in the film industry for years, not only on screen but behind the screen too. The representation of female directors in 2014 was only at 11.9%, this is not an accurate representation of real life. It has been found that on average female directors have fewer opportunities and will direct fewer films in their career.

https://www.nyfa.edu/film-school-blog/gender-inequality-in-film-infographic-updated-in-2018/ This article has lots of statistics about gender inequality in the film industry, it is very interesting but also shocking to read. It not only focuses on actresses on screen but also focuses on those who work with the film crew. They also focus on the gender bias in awards but also mention actresses that have been inspiring, as well as actresses that are emerging in the film industry.

The media industry has become influential in determining the world’s perception of gender. In many films, they follow the traditional roles that women and men are ‘supposed’ to adhere to. Traditional masculinity is portrayed as ‘Hard’, they are usually the breadwinners, assertive, tough and are judged upon their actions. Traditional femininity is usually illustrated as ‘Soft’ and they are usually dependent on a man, weak/passive and are judged upon their looks/family status. Although it could now be argued that we are branching away from these ‘traditional’ stories, with the rise of female protagonists in Hunger Games, the Good Place and Pretty Little Liars. However, there is still a lot of dependence on the men in these shows/films. For example, in The Hunger Games, although Katniss is the main female protagonist, she is still always helped by her male friends, and although the movies are about a war, they focus heavily on a love triangle.

The James Bond films are perfect when it comes to explaining traditional femininity and masculinity, and although there are characters that fall out of these roles such as ‘M’ who is a powerful woman throughout her appearances in movies, there is still a heavy portrayal of traditional roles. Women are often an accessory or a villain to 007 ‘but they share one purpose: to inject sex and danger wherever Agent 007 may lay his head at night’ (Klassen, 2012).

If we focus on ‘Skyfall’ in particular, there are many scenes where ‘Bond’ is seen shirtless and there is one point in the movie, where Bond and the ‘Bond Girl’ are seen in the shower together. In this case, the ‘Bond Girl’ or Sévérine is associated with Bond’s villain: Silva. This scene can directly relate to Laura Mulvey’s theory of the ‘Male Gaze’ or scopophilia, where the woman is presented as a sexual object for the pleasure of men. Similarly, the ‘female gaze’ can be applied, where the women see themselves through the eyes of men.

‘M’ the powerful female character is also portrayed somewhat negatively in this film, she is asked to step down from her role as she has made poor decisions, and ultimately, she is killed off. This shows audiences that women are mere accessories to the main ‘hero’, it also shows the Bond Franchise is popular mainstream movies with underlying ideologies that are still outdated.

“The act of treating a person as an object of sexual pleasure, a commodity, or an object without regard to their personality or dignity”

Laura Mulvey 1975
Made by Emma Adkins

Bibliography

Klassen, A. (2012). From Honey Rryder to Pussy Galore: The evolution of the James Bond Girl., Accessed 11th April 2019. https://www.thedailybeast.com/from-honey-ryder-to-pussy-galore-the-evolution-of-the-james-bond-girl

Mulvey, L (1975) Visual Pleasure and Narrative Cinema London : Afterall Books

#BlackLivesMatter- How hashtag activism is changing activism

The global hashtag activism campaign #BlackLivesMatter was born when George Zimmerman was acquitted after shooting and killing Trayvon Martin, a seventeen-year-old boy. This hashtag became symbolic to all modern-day racial injustices and it allowed audiences to take to social media to try and enact change. The hashtag has had a global reach, it reached audiences all around the world, for example in Ireland, England, The Netherlands, Germany, and South Africa and many other countries gathered for rallies and protests in response to #BlackLivesMatter. The hashtag since has been used nearly 30 million times in the 5 years since which is over 17,000 times a day. Due to the global reach that this was able to have, it made a great impact.

“The increased visibility of such deaths through social media had led to the emergence of #BlackLivesMatter” (The Routledge companion to media and activism edited by G Meikle, page 1)

Meikle (2018)

Research showed that Caucasian’s bias in favour of their own race decreased when the major events of #BlackLivesMatter and its high points of struggle. This may be because when the high points of this movement, people are able to identify, and it allows the audience to empathise. America also implemented legislation changes in response to the movement, in twenty-four states they passed at least 40 new measures addressing such things as officer-worn cameras and education and training about racial bias along with independent investigations when police use force.

Made by Emma Adkins

“the accessibility of the associated media also allows for connections between movements and activists around the world”

Highfield (2016)

This hashtag has been prevalent online for over five years, proving that not only is it relevant, but there is still a long way to go in changing racial attitudes globally. It is only right that as technology evolves, so should activism. As new platforms emerge, there are more ways to communicate which also means there are more ways to spread activism, and hashtag activism has proven to be an effective way in enacting change and education.

“Facebook does amplify activism for the same reason it amplifies photos of puppies. Items that strike people’s emotions are more likely to generate responses and more likely to be shared”

Vaidhyanathan (2018)
Patrisse Cullors, co-founder of Black Lives Matter, and Tarana Burke, founder of MeToo speak about the birth of their movements

Bibliography:

Dijck, J (2013) The Culture of Connectivity: A critical history of social media, New York: Oxford University Press

Highfield, T (2016) Social media and everyday politics Cambridge: Polity Press

Meikle, G (2018) The Routledge companion to media and activism London: Routledge

The Irish Times (2018) The #BlackLivesMatter hashtag used nearly 30 million times, Accessed 24th March 2019 https://www.irishtimes.com/business/technology/the-blacklivesmatter-hashtag-used-nearly-30-million-times-1.3561562

Vaidhyanathan, S (2018) Antisocial media: how Facebook disconnects us and undermines democracy, New York, NY, United States of America: Oxford University Press

MeToo- How Hashtag activism is changing activism

Hashtag activism has become a beginning place for activism and is a key way for audiences to connect and become involved and participate in movements no matter their geographical location. I would argue that there are both advantages and disadvantages to using the internet to highlight issues in the world. Many people may assume that by ‘liking’ or ‘re-tweeting’ that they have done their bit for that particular movement and will not advance the cause by going to protests or enacting change outside of the internet.  However, education in issues is half the battle, and I think the more people that are educated, through whatever method this may be is an advancement and this is where social media I feel has made an impact.

“Tweeting once using a campaign hashtag, signing an online petition or changing a user icon in solidarity can demonstrate engagement with the issue or movement, but not necessarily ongoing activism” (Highfield:98)

#MeToo campaign was started in 2017 when celebrity Alyssa Milano tweeted asking anyone who had been sexually harassed or assaulted to reply to the tweet with ‘me too’. This movement not only captured the world but enacted real change. Twitter confirmed in 2017 that within a week of the tweet not only was it tweeted over 1.7 million times, but that it had been reached by at least 85 countries (had over 1000 tweets). Vaidhyanathan (2018) stated that “Facebook does amplify activism” and in this case this is true. Facebook also confirmed that within less than 24 hours there were more than 12 million posts, comments, and reactions regarding the #MeToo campaign by 4.7 million users across the globe. This shows that a high number of people were able to engage in this social movement within a week of its birth.

As the hashtag enabled many people to become involved in the movement, it was able to implement real change. 300 plus actresses, directors and writers launched a ‘Times Up’ movement that raised $22 million within the first month, this was put towards the #MeToo cause. A lot of this money was used to fund legal assistance for the victims that had identified themselves through this movement from suffering sexual violence or misconduct. Not only did this help financially, but it also was proven that there was a 23 percent rise in the use of rape, abuse and incest hotline from October 2017. (BBC 2018)

“a personalised frame such as #MeToo enabled a great many people to connect with its underlying concept of sexual harassment” (Meikle, G)

The #MeToo movement was also able to enact change to legislation globally. France has since introduced fines and prison for upskirting and catcalling as well as fines for work pay discrimination. Furthermore, the UK Government now requires all companies with 250 or more employees to report their gender pay gap.

Alyssa Milano talks about the progress that #MeToo campaign has had, and how far it has to go.

Research has also highlighted a differing change in attitudes, that over half of women aged 18-34 and 58% of young men are more likely to challenge behaviour that they deem inappropriate or sexist. (Fawcett Society 2018) This not only shows that social media has impacted social change in the government and legislation but has also enacted change on a more personal basis and has helped in changing mindsets to defend each other and promote equality.

Although many changes have been implemented as a result, there are still many obstacles that the #MeToo campaign did not change or improve. For example, US president Donald Trump supported Brett Kavanaugh and denigrated Dr. Christine Ford. This not only shows that sexism is prevalent in everyday life but in politics also. This can be seen further by looking at statistics in the workplace, 9 out of 10 women in UK companies are paid less than men; big digital companies are the worst for this. Google’s “female employees mean hourly rate is 17 percent lower than mens” and “just 22 percent of their highest paid staff are women”. (NS Tech 2018). Despite this, social media has enabled the #MeToo campaign to create many lasting changes, therefore making the campaign significant, effective and impactful.

Created by Emma Adkins

Bibliography:

Highfield, T (2016) Social media and everyday politics Cambridge: Polity Press

Meikle, G (2018) The Routledge companion to media and activism London: Routledge

Vaidhyanathan, S (2018) Antisocial media: How Facebook Disconnects us and undermines democracy Oxford: Oxford University Press

#MeToo- How Hashtag activism is changing activism

PSB and the rise of internet companies

Ever since the beginning of Public Service Broadcasting in 1955, it has been popular and was designed as a public service to provide information, advice or entertainment without making a profit. In the UK, the BBC is the most prevalent, companies grouped together to form a monopoly which is funded by a license fee.

Although Public Service Broadcasting has been important in the past, with the rise of internet companies such as Netflix, Amazon Prime, etc, the question is whether Public Service Broadcasting is relevant anymore. In the Ofcom report in 2015, there is a lot of mention about the rise of internet companies and how this will affect / how it has affected Public Service Broadcasting.

Such a good read on Netflix’s rise. Love this description of an executive retreat: “We studied AOL and Blockbuster as cautionary tales. We knew we had to disrupt, including disrupting ourselves, or someone else would do it.” https://t.co/Z0Qs5TSmYy by @sherman4949— Christina Farr (@chrissyfarr) June 13, 2018

“Netflix, if not directly responsible, is at least holding the murder weapon.”

“Netflix and YouTube are able to provide, relative to PSB catch-up-services, and their significant investment in technology and the user experience, it may be increasingly difficult for PSB to maintain their current large audiences” (Ofcom 2015)

This is referenced in particular to the younger generation, with the rise of internet companies and social media becoming a new way for audiences to gather the news the need for Public Service Broadcasting may decrease. It has been found that there are more subscriptions to Netflix, Amazon and NOW TV than to traditional ‘pay’ TV services. (Ofcom 2018) This means PSB may have to look at other ways of keeping audiences especially the younger generation. However, throughout the report, it still indicates that “Importance and satisfaction is increasing” (Ofcom 2015) and that the need for PSB is still very much alive.

However, it does seem that there has been a decline in children’s TV, drama and comedy, but an increase and continued investment in the news. PSB are aware that ‘News remains the most important genre to PSB audiences’ (Ofcom 2015) It could be indicated that high satisfaction with PSB may be focused on News and not these other areas. The obvious decline in these areas could further indicate the rise of internet companies as the audience may be finding better alternatives elsewhere but are still wanting to keep updated with the news in traditional ways.

It has also been proven that there is a current lack of diversity in PSB and that PSB does not portray society as a whole. For example ‘over half (55%) of people from black ethnic groups (such as African or Caribbean) felt underrepresented and a similar proportion felt that they were negatively portrayed’(Ofcom 2015)Even though similar issues are raised with others, not only ethnic groups but also LGBTQ and religious groups, the report states that this needs to be ‘monitored’, they create no plan to help the lack of representation in PSB. This could be due to an unrepresentative media workforce, or a lack of investment in diversity. This comes full circle to PSB investing more in news and less in other areas due to the lack of attention these other areas are currently receiving.

Created by Emma Adkins

Bibliography:

(Online) Ofcom (2015) Public Service Broadcasting in the Internet Age p 17-18, accessed on 31st March 2019 https://www.ofcom.org.uk/__data/assets/pdf_file/0024/81069/psb_annual_report_summary.pdf

(Online) Ofcom (2017-2018) News Consumption in the UK: 2018: Jigsaw Research https://www.ofcom.org.uk/__data/assets/pdf_file/0024/116529/news-consumption-2018.pdf accessed on 24th March 2019

PSB & The Rise of Internet Companies

Gender media issues- Ads

Media, especially social media has never been more prevalent in daily life. We are surrounded every day by media, whether consciously or unconsciously. A US adult spends on average 45 minutes per day on social media and a UK adult spends on average 32 minutes on social media. However, it has been researched and confirmed that adults spend almost 8 hours a day being consumed by different types of media. This includes television, newspapers, and radio, etc, and television is still the largest type of media that is being consumed by adults.

When looking online for how many adverts we are exposed to daily, there are different numbers, some as high as 5,000 ads per day, varying from 2,500 per day. Which is still higher than I thought the number was going to be.

Made by Emma Adkins

People use media to construct a view of reality and we draw on these representations available to us from the media, therefore if women are portrayed in a certain way, women are more likely to draw conclusions that this is the way a woman should act and be. Seeing this many ads unconsciously, automatically reinforces gender ideals that we do not even realize that we are consuming.

“The commodification of the sexualized female body, used to sell anything from cars to perfume to jeans to toilet cleaners, is seen as contributing to an increase in sexual violence against women”

(Ross 1957:8)

American Apparel (a clothing company) has come under scrutiny for their sexist ads over the years, including the sexualization of not only women but school children. American Apparel released an advert for an opening of one of their stores, this advert had the text ‘Now Open’ with a woman on the cover with her legs open. This is clearly sexualizing women to sell their products. It could be that they were aiming for the attention of men, thinking they may go to the store to buy products for the women in their lives. Or they could be targeting women, thinking that women will want to look like the woman on the front cover., Regardless, in this advertisement, American Apparel is essentially selling sex, the woman in this campaign is being portrayed as a ‘piece of meat’.

In another advert, they advertised a back to school range, the main picture for this is a photo shows a model bent over and she is being photographed from a low angle, because of this low angle you can see her buttocks. This not only sexualizes women, but it is sexualizing children. This advert was complained about and ASA (Advertising Standards Authority) upheld the complaints stating, “We considered the images were gratuitous and objectified women and were therefore sexist and likely to cause serious and widespread offense.” The ASA also mentioned that this could be considered as ‘upskirting’ and this picture looks like it has been taken without consent, which makes it even further offensive. The ASA warned American Apparel to not produce content like this in the future.

Both adverts are also not ‘professional’ photography and almost seen as amateur photography. This could be so that the women seem more real, but in reality, it makes the adverts look more sexualized.  And even though women are being used in these adverts, it certainly seems that these adverts are more focused on men.

“The power of the culture industry’s ideology is such that conformity has replaced consciousness”

(Adomo 1991:90)

Advertising and the media matters, it tells us what is ‘normal’ and content like the ads previously discussed are designed to shock and break through the 5,000 adverts that adults see every day. However, this causes a negative effect as the sexualization of women and in American Apparel’s case, of children becomes normalized. Unrealistic expectations within adverts are what sells the product, we as consumers are shown an ‘ideal’ or ‘perfect’ way of life that we should be living, and instead of selling their product, they sell this idea.

#AmericanApparel causes outrage with brow-raising back-to-school ad http://t.co/BsXBC6VOGY pic.twitter.com/wJ5a8ZDLmk— CBS Los Angeles (@CBSLA) August 8, 2014

Bibliography:

Ross, K (1957) Gendered Media women, men, and identity politics, Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield

Adomo (1991) from Gauntlett, D (2008) Media, gender and identity: An introduction,New York, N.Y. : Routledge

Gender Media issues- Ads

Brexit: How social media impacted the referendum

Just as social media has become ingrained in our everyday lives, we can only assume that it now has become ingrained in not only advertising but news and political marketing too. With social media becoming the most popular type of online news, used by 44% of adults (Ofcom 2017-2018:2) it is only expected that information on the 2016 Brexit referendum was easily available and accessible online.

The turnout for the referendum was at a high, with 72.2 percent of the population voting, which eclipsed the turnout for the 2015 general election which was at 66 percent. The young vote (18-24-year olds) was also at a twenty-five-year high. Although strictly there is no correlation it has been commented that “the press on both sides of the argument did an effective job of stimulating public interest and action” (Hänska; Bauchowitz, 2017) and this includes the use of social media.

Made by Emma Adkins

Research showed that many Twitter users who were supporting the ‘LEAVE’ campaign were more active and prevalent online in expressing their views than ‘REMAIN’ users, who were less visible and less engaged online. Similar patterns were found on Instagram and Facebook, they found “similar patterns of Eurosceptic views being communicated with a greater number of users on those platforms” (Herman; Polonski, 2016:33)

Not only did the ‘LEAVE’ campaign have more support social media, but this was also similarly seen in newspaper content. The right-leaning press came out with nearly 4.8 million sales for the Leave campaign. However, the more liberal and left-of-center newspapers who backed the remain campaign sold 1.8 million. (Brexit, Trump and the media)

In regard to social media, it is important to mention the Cambridge Analytica scandal that was key in influencing votes. The company managed to get access to personal Facebook data of 87 million people via a personality quiz on Facebook. In turn, this was sold to advertisers to sway key potential votes. Cambridge Analytica sold data to political parties and businesses who wanted to change the audience’s behaviour (Osbourne 2018). This could be viewed as psychological manipulation in order to achieve the outcome the businesses or political parties favored. The only goal was capital gains and not the best interest of the public.

But this was not the only type of media that could be argued did not serve the public good, for example ‘Vote Leave built a campaign around one big resounding number: Britain was sending the EU £350m a week, which could be spent on the NHS instead’ (Worrall 2017: 230) this was reported in newspapers and on social media. In this instance the media did not serve the public good, false information was presented as facts which people used to make an informed decision about their position.

Bibliography:

Herman; Polonski, Hänska; Bauchowitz; Worrall (2016-2017) Brexit, Trump and the media, Bury St Edmunds, Suffolk : Arima Publishin

Ofcom (2017-2018) News Consumption in the UK: 2018: Jigsaw Research https://www.ofcom.org.uk/__data/assets/pdf_file/0024/116529/news-consumption-2018.pdf

Osbourne, H (2018) The Guardian, What is Cambridge Analytica? The format the centre of Facebook’s data breach https://www.theguardian.com/news/2018/mar/18/what-is-cambridge-analytica-firm-at-centre-of-facebook-data-breach accessed 04/12/2018

Brexit: How social media impacted the referendum