Gender Media issues- Ads

Gender media issues- Ads

Media, especially social media has never been more prevalent in daily life. We are surrounded every day by media, whether consciously or unconsciously. A US adult spends on average 45 minutes per day on social media and a UK adult spends on average 32 minutes on social media. However, it has been researched and confirmed that adults spend almost 8 hours a day being consumed by different types of media. This includes television, newspapers, and radio, etc, and television is still the largest type of media that is being consumed by adults.

When looking online for how many adverts we are exposed to daily, there are different numbers, some as high as 5,000 ads per day, varying from 2,500 per day. Which is still higher than I thought the number was going to be.

Made by Emma Adkins

People use media to construct a view of reality and we draw on these representations available to us from the media, therefore if women are portrayed in a certain way, women are more likely to draw conclusions that this is the way a woman should act and be. Seeing this many ads unconsciously, automatically reinforces gender ideals that we do not even realize that we are consuming.

“The commodification of the sexualized female body, used to sell anything from cars to perfume to jeans to toilet cleaners, is seen as contributing to an increase in sexual violence against women”

(Ross 1957:8)

American Apparel (a clothing company) has come under scrutiny for their sexist ads over the years, including the sexualization of not only women but school children. American Apparel released an advert for an opening of one of their stores, this advert had the text ‘Now Open’ with a woman on the cover with her legs open. This is clearly sexualizing women to sell their products. It could be that they were aiming for the attention of men, thinking they may go to the store to buy products for the women in their lives. Or they could be targeting women, thinking that women will want to look like the woman on the front cover., Regardless, in this advertisement, American Apparel is essentially selling sex, the woman in this campaign is being portrayed as a ‘piece of meat’.

In another advert, they advertised a back to school range, the main picture for this is a photo shows a model bent over and she is being photographed from a low angle, because of this low angle you can see her buttocks. This not only sexualizes women, but it is sexualizing children. This advert was complained about and ASA (Advertising Standards Authority) upheld the complaints stating, “We considered the images were gratuitous and objectified women and were therefore sexist and likely to cause serious and widespread offense.” The ASA also mentioned that this could be considered as ‘upskirting’ and this picture looks like it has been taken without consent, which makes it even further offensive. The ASA warned American Apparel to not produce content like this in the future.

Both adverts are also not ‘professional’ photography and almost seen as amateur photography. This could be so that the women seem more real, but in reality, it makes the adverts look more sexualized.  And even though women are being used in these adverts, it certainly seems that these adverts are more focused on men.

“The power of the culture industry’s ideology is such that conformity has replaced consciousness”

(Adomo 1991:90)

Advertising and the media matters, it tells us what is ‘normal’ and content like the ads previously discussed are designed to shock and break through the 5,000 adverts that adults see every day. However, this causes a negative effect as the sexualization of women and in American Apparel’s case, of children becomes normalized. Unrealistic expectations within adverts are what sells the product, we as consumers are shown an ‘ideal’ or ‘perfect’ way of life that we should be living, and instead of selling their product, they sell this idea.

#AmericanApparel causes outrage with brow-raising back-to-school ad http://t.co/BsXBC6VOGY pic.twitter.com/wJ5a8ZDLmk— CBS Los Angeles (@CBSLA) August 8, 2014

Bibliography:

Ross, K (1957) Gendered Media women, men, and identity politics, Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield

Adomo (1991) from Gauntlett, D (2008) Media, gender and identity: An introduction,New York, N.Y. : Routledge

Brexit: How social media impacted the referendum

Brexit: How social media impacted the referendum

Just as social media has become ingrained in our everyday lives, we can only assume that it now has become ingrained in not only advertising but news and political marketing too. With social media becoming the most popular type of online news, used by 44% of adults (Ofcom 2017-2018:2) it is only expected that information on the 2016 Brexit referendum was easily available and accessible online.

The turnout for the referendum was at a high, with 72.2 percent of the population voting, which eclipsed the turnout for the 2015 general election which was at 66 percent. The young vote (18-24-year olds) was also at a twenty-five-year high. Although strictly there is no correlation it has been commented that “the press on both sides of the argument did an effective job of stimulating public interest and action” (Hänska; Bauchowitz, 2017) and this includes the use of social media.

Made by Emma Adkins

Research showed that many Twitter users who were supporting the ‘LEAVE’ campaign were more active and prevalent online in expressing their views than ‘REMAIN’ users, who were less visible and less engaged online. Similar patterns were found on Instagram and Facebook, they found “similar patterns of Eurosceptic views being communicated with a greater number of users on those platforms” (Herman; Polonski, 2016:33)

Not only did the ‘LEAVE’ campaign have more support social media, but this was also similarly seen in newspaper content. The right-leaning press came out with nearly 4.8 million sales for the Leave campaign. However, the more liberal and left-of-center newspapers who backed the remain campaign sold 1.8 million. (Brexit, Trump and the media)

In regard to social media, it is important to mention the Cambridge Analytica scandal that was key in influencing votes. The company managed to get access to personal Facebook data of 87 million people via a personality quiz on Facebook. In turn, this was sold to advertisers to sway key potential votes. Cambridge Analytica sold data to political parties and businesses who wanted to change the audience’s behaviour (Osbourne 2018). This could be viewed as psychological manipulation in order to achieve the outcome the businesses or political parties favored. The only goal was capital gains and not the best interest of the public.

But this was not the only type of media that could be argued did not serve the public good, for example ‘Vote Leave built a campaign around one big resounding number: Britain was sending the EU £350m a week, which could be spent on the NHS instead’ (Worrall 2017: 230) this was reported in newspapers and on social media. In this instance the media did not serve the public good, false information was presented as facts which people used to make an informed decision about their position.

Bibliography:

Herman; Polonski, Hänska; Bauchowitz; Worrall (2016-2017) Brexit, Trump and the media, Bury St Edmunds, Suffolk : Arima Publishin

Ofcom (2017-2018) News Consumption in the UK: 2018: Jigsaw Research https://www.ofcom.org.uk/__data/assets/pdf_file/0024/116529/news-consumption-2018.pdf

Osbourne, H (2018) The Guardian, What is Cambridge Analytica? The format the centre of Facebook’s data breach https://www.theguardian.com/news/2018/mar/18/what-is-cambridge-analytica-firm-at-centre-of-facebook-data-breach accessed 04/12/2018