Celebrity Activism

Celebrity Activism

Celebrity activism has been slowly growing, more celebrities want more attention and fame, and getting involved in activist movements is a way to bring themselves more media attention. However, it also brings a lot of awareness to the movement or charity. Although some celebrities do become involved in activism for more media attention, some celebrities do use their platform to educate. It has become easier for celebrities to become involved in these movements, as they were previously controlled by their agents or PR, but social media has enabled celebrities to take control of the causes and movements they want to support.

Celebrities bring:

  • Awareness
  • Political Lobbying
  • Fundraising

“Celebrity icons are very often the public faces of wider movements”

Rojeck (2002)

It has been researched that the public is more likely to become involved and support movements whose celebrity endorsers had a sincere commitment. (Samman et al, 2009)

Lady Gaga has been involved with many activist movements since she rose to fame in 2008. However, most notably she has been very involved in activism against the ‘Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell’ campaign. One of her big activist movements was wearing the famous meat dress to the MTV Video Music Awards, there were many different interpretations of the dress, including Rojek (2002) suggesting that it could have been considered a ‘feminist movement’, she could have worn the dress to represent how women are treated in the music industry: like a piece of meat. However, she later stated that it was in support of the ‘Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell’ policy. The policy meant that LGBTQ+ people who were serving in the US military were unable to disclose their sexuality or talk about their relationships (even if they were married etc).

Made by Emma Adkins

Lady Gaga, not only wore this dress in support of a repeal of this policy, she also posted a video of her trying to phone her senator to demand change (but she is unable to get through), she encourages her fans to ‘phone their senators to ask them to vote for the repeal of the policy’. (Framing, 2013) Her fans did this, some getting through and some not, but they not only posted online of themselves phoning their senators, but they also encouraged their friends and family to do the same. By doing this Lady Gaga, not only reached her fans, but she reached a wider audience in trying to repeal this policy. Later on, the policy was finally repealed.

“However, the use of social media platforms such as Twitter, Facebook, YouTube and Tumblr by celebrities to communicate with their fans is now becoming an increasingly widespread occurrence”

Duit, L; Zwaan, K (2014)

However, there are always risks when associating celebrities with a charity or a movement. This is clearly seen by Naomi Campbell’s association with PETA. She appeared on an advert stating, “we’d rather go naked than wear fur”. After this, she wore fur at the Milan Fashion show in 1997, she claimed: “it’s only fashion, I don’t know what the fuss is about”. PETA lost all credibility for their campaign and to this day the battle between PETA and Naomi Campbell still rages.

Bibliography:

Duit, L; Zwaan, K (2014) The Ashgate Research companion to Fan Cultures, Farnham: Ashgate

Framing, RE (2013) Examining celebrity activism and social media: Lady Gaga Fandom and Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell, Accessed online 25th March 2019 http://reframe.sussex.ac.uk/activistmedia/2013/05/examining-celebrity-activism-and-social-media-lady-gaga-fandom-and-dont-ask-dont-tell/

Rojek, C (2002) Fame Attack: The inflation of Celebrity and its consequences, London: Routledge

Samman, E, Auliffe, EM, MacLachlan, M (2009) The role of celebrity in endorsing poverty reduction through international aid. International Journal of Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Marketing

#BlackLivesMatter- How hashtag activism is changing activism

The global hashtag activism campaign #BlackLivesMatter was born when George Zimmerman was acquitted after shooting and killing Trayvon Martin, a seventeen-year-old boy. This hashtag became symbolic to all modern-day racial injustices and it allowed audiences to take to social media to try and enact change. The hashtag has had a global reach, it reached audiences all around the world, for example in Ireland, England, The Netherlands, Germany, and South Africa and many other countries gathered for rallies and protests in response to #BlackLivesMatter. The hashtag since has been used nearly 30 million times in the 5 years since which is over 17,000 times a day. Due to the global reach that this was able to have, it made a great impact.

“The increased visibility of such deaths through social media had led to the emergence of #BlackLivesMatter” (The Routledge companion to media and activism edited by G Meikle, page 1)

Meikle (2018)

Research showed that Caucasian’s bias in favour of their own race decreased when the major events of #BlackLivesMatter and its high points of struggle. This may be because when the high points of this movement, people are able to identify, and it allows the audience to empathise. America also implemented legislation changes in response to the movement, in twenty-four states they passed at least 40 new measures addressing such things as officer-worn cameras and education and training about racial bias along with independent investigations when police use force.

Made by Emma Adkins

“the accessibility of the associated media also allows for connections between movements and activists around the world”

Highfield (2016)

This hashtag has been prevalent online for over five years, proving that not only is it relevant, but there is still a long way to go in changing racial attitudes globally. It is only right that as technology evolves, so should activism. As new platforms emerge, there are more ways to communicate which also means there are more ways to spread activism, and hashtag activism has proven to be an effective way in enacting change and education.

“Facebook does amplify activism for the same reason it amplifies photos of puppies. Items that strike people’s emotions are more likely to generate responses and more likely to be shared”

Vaidhyanathan (2018)
Patrisse Cullors, co-founder of Black Lives Matter, and Tarana Burke, founder of MeToo speak about the birth of their movements

Bibliography:

Dijck, J (2013) The Culture of Connectivity: A critical history of social media, New York: Oxford University Press

Highfield, T (2016) Social media and everyday politics Cambridge: Polity Press

Meikle, G (2018) The Routledge companion to media and activism London: Routledge

The Irish Times (2018) The #BlackLivesMatter hashtag used nearly 30 million times, Accessed 24th March 2019 https://www.irishtimes.com/business/technology/the-blacklivesmatter-hashtag-used-nearly-30-million-times-1.3561562

Vaidhyanathan, S (2018) Antisocial media: how Facebook disconnects us and undermines democracy, New York, NY, United States of America: Oxford University Press

#MeToo- How Hashtag activism is changing activism

MeToo- How Hashtag activism is changing activism

Hashtag activism has become a beginning place for activism and is a key way for audiences to connect and become involved and participate in movements no matter their geographical location. I would argue that there are both advantages and disadvantages to using the internet to highlight issues in the world. Many people may assume that by ‘liking’ or ‘re-tweeting’ that they have done their bit for that particular movement and will not advance the cause by going to protests or enacting change outside of the internet.  However, education in issues is half the battle, and I think the more people that are educated, through whatever method this may be is an advancement and this is where social media I feel has made an impact.

“Tweeting once using a campaign hashtag, signing an online petition or changing a user icon in solidarity can demonstrate engagement with the issue or movement, but not necessarily ongoing activism” (Highfield:98)

#MeToo campaign was started in 2017 when celebrity Alyssa Milano tweeted asking anyone who had been sexually harassed or assaulted to reply to the tweet with ‘me too’. This movement not only captured the world but enacted real change. Twitter confirmed in 2017 that within a week of the tweet not only was it tweeted over 1.7 million times, but that it had been reached by at least 85 countries (had over 1000 tweets). Vaidhyanathan (2018) stated that “Facebook does amplify activism” and in this case this is true. Facebook also confirmed that within less than 24 hours there were more than 12 million posts, comments, and reactions regarding the #MeToo campaign by 4.7 million users across the globe. This shows that a high number of people were able to engage in this social movement within a week of its birth.

As the hashtag enabled many people to become involved in the movement, it was able to implement real change. 300 plus actresses, directors and writers launched a ‘Times Up’ movement that raised $22 million within the first month, this was put towards the #MeToo cause. A lot of this money was used to fund legal assistance for the victims that had identified themselves through this movement from suffering sexual violence or misconduct. Not only did this help financially, but it also was proven that there was a 23 percent rise in the use of rape, abuse and incest hotline from October 2017. (BBC 2018)

“a personalised frame such as #MeToo enabled a great many people to connect with its underlying concept of sexual harassment” (Meikle, G)

The #MeToo movement was also able to enact change to legislation globally. France has since introduced fines and prison for upskirting and catcalling as well as fines for work pay discrimination. Furthermore, the UK Government now requires all companies with 250 or more employees to report their gender pay gap.

Alyssa Milano talks about the progress that #MeToo campaign has had, and how far it has to go.

Research has also highlighted a differing change in attitudes, that over half of women aged 18-34 and 58% of young men are more likely to challenge behaviour that they deem inappropriate or sexist. (Fawcett Society 2018) This not only shows that social media has impacted social change in the government and legislation but has also enacted change on a more personal basis and has helped in changing mindsets to defend each other and promote equality.

Although many changes have been implemented as a result, there are still many obstacles that the #MeToo campaign did not change or improve. For example, US president Donald Trump supported Brett Kavanaugh and denigrated Dr. Christine Ford. This not only shows that sexism is prevalent in everyday life but in politics also. This can be seen further by looking at statistics in the workplace, 9 out of 10 women in UK companies are paid less than men; big digital companies are the worst for this. Google’s “female employees mean hourly rate is 17 percent lower than mens” and “just 22 percent of their highest paid staff are women”. (NS Tech 2018). Despite this, social media has enabled the #MeToo campaign to create many lasting changes, therefore making the campaign significant, effective and impactful.

Created by Emma Adkins

Bibliography:

Highfield, T (2016) Social media and everyday politics Cambridge: Polity Press

Meikle, G (2018) The Routledge companion to media and activism London: Routledge

Vaidhyanathan, S (2018) Antisocial media: How Facebook Disconnects us and undermines democracy Oxford: Oxford University Press